Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:06
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Do empaths fall easier for abusive people?
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
FDA Gives Tomato Recall Over Salmonella Highest Risk Warning - TODAY.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How do I maintain and care for granite countertops in a coastal climate like Pompano Beach?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Omada Health Shares Soar After IPO as GLP-1 Drugs Fuel Interest - WSJ
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The Universe's Largest Map Has Arrived, And You Can Stargaze Like Never Before - ScienceAlert
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
FDA grants limited approval to new Covid vaccine from Moderna - NBC News
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.